#581
"Florida Statutes Title XLVI. Crimes § 776.012. Use or threatened use of force in defense of person:
1 [...]
2: A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. A person who uses or threatens to use deadly force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground if the person using or threatening to use the deadly force is not engaged in a criminal activity and is in a place where he or she has a right to be."
Cierto, dice que la persona si se siente amenazada, pero, hace mención a "reasonably believes", lo que nos lleva a:
What Do Juries Consider When Assessing Self-Defense Claims?
If a judge does not find that you acted in self-defense, that defense can still be presented to a jury during your trial. To determine if your actions were warranted, a jury will assess what a “reasonable person” would have done in the same situation. Making this determination is known as an “objective standard.” To demonstrate your guilt, the state must overcome the claim of self-defense beyond any reasonable doubt.
Es decir, como era de esperar, va mucho más allá de, "me siento amenazado". Pero obivamente si nos informamos a través de Espejo Público y demás, pues así vas. Con propaganda barata de asusta-viejas.
Y en este caso además, hay un video que lo deja bien claro y está más que justificado la légitima defensa. Joder, nose ni que estamos discutiendo.
